The New York Times’ reporting on Biden-to-Trump defectors reveals deep voter frustration with both parties, raising urgent questions for Democrats heading into the midterms.
What to Know:
- A New York Times analysis of working-class voters shows many Biden 2020 supporters defected to Trump in 2024, swinging key states.
- Economic anxieties like inflation and job security consistently outweighed cultural or ideological debates.
- Voters interviewed described Democrats as preoccupied with identity politics and overseas spending.
- Immigration remains divisive: some applaud Trump’s tough stance, others recoil from deportations and raids.
- Both parties must adapt strategies to win back disillusioned voters ahead of 2026 and 2028.
When The New York Times interviewed dozens of working-class voters across swing states, a pattern emerged that should alarm Democratic strategists. These were not ideological hardliners but ordinary Americans who once saw Joe Biden as a stabilizing force in 2020.
Former President Joe Biden (Left) and President Donald J. Trump (right); image credit, cropped from AP/Alex Brandon
By 2024, many had either defected to Donald Trump or disengaged altogether. Interviewees largely expressed a feeling that the Democratic Party had become out of touch with common concerns.
Economic Anxiety Above All Else
The Times analysis found that inflation, stagnant wages, and rising costs consistently topped voters’ concerns. Kendall Wood, a Virginia truck driver, told the paper that Democrats seemed “more concerned with D.E.I. and L.G.B.T.Q. issues” than with “kitchen-table issues.” A poll from The New York Times and Ipsos confirmed the perception that many Americans did not believe Democrats were prioritizing the economic issues that mattered most.
This disconnect is politically consequential. In states like Pennsylvania and Michigan, even small swings among blue-collar workers proved decisive in 2024. Trump’s relentless focus on the economy, however simplistic, gave him a credibility edge that Democrats struggled to match.
Disillusionment With Party Identity
The Times analysis indicated that Democrats often feel that an emphasis on identity politics, rather than common concerns, causes them to become isolated. Raymond Teachey, a longtime Democratic voter from Pennsylvania, said:
“Some of them turned their back on their base.”
For him, public safety and economic stability mattered more than symbolic fights. This sense of abandonment helps explain why pivotal counties that once leaned Democratic have drifted right. It also reflects a deeper strategic challenge for Democrats. Running on cultural progress alone, without tying it directly to economic well-being, risks further alienating voters who feel unseen.
Immigration and Foreign Policy Divides
Interviews conducted by the Times further revealed the dual impact of immigration and foreign policy. Some voters backed Trump’s push to strengthen the border, but others recoiled from the human toll. Sarah Smarty described her friend’s husband, deported after 25 years in the U.S., and called the policy “really hard on their family.”
Overseas spending added to the resentment. As wars in Ukraine and the Middle East dominated headlines, voters like Smarty and Marlon Flores of Houston questioned why billions were flowing abroad while their communities faced rising costs and stagnant opportunity.
“No matter how many times we have gone red, or even blue, the blue-collar workers have seen little progress,” Flores said.
Not Done With Democrats, Just Done With the Old Guard
Despite their disillusionment, many of these voters told The Times they had not permanently abandoned Democrats. What they rejected was the party’s aging leadership and its failure to articulate a relatable economic vision. “Stop being friggin’ old,” said Cinnamon Boffa of Pennsylvania, who supported Biden in 2020 but skipped the presidential race in 2024.
Democrats can recover lost ground, but this hinges on their ability to elevate fresh perspectives and tailor their messaging to resonate with the everyday experiences of voters, reflecting a clear desire for generational shifts. The risk is not just losing elections but losing relevance with the very electorate that once formed their backbone.
Wrap Up
The New York Times' reporting paints a sobering picture for Democrats. These are not Trump loyalists but pragmatic voters who felt abandoned, first by one party, then by the other. Their volatility makes them the most consequential bloc in American politics.
Heading into 2026, Democrats must show they understand the economic pain these voters face, while Republicans must prove they can deliver more than rhetoric. If neither party rises to the challenge, the cracks revealed in 2024 could widen into a lasting political realignment. What happens with these disaffected voters will shape not only the midterms but also the battle for the presidency in 2028.
-1.png)